Ranking Categories > Program Selection

Program Selection

How does your program
compare with the best
in Switzerland?

An independent ranking that documents your program's real impact
based on alumni feedback, track record, and substance. Four discipline rankings.
NZZ-ZHAW validated. No fees.

Register now
  • Methodology with ZHAW & NZZ
  • Evidence-based impact metrics
  • 45+ Swiss programs pre-listed  

What you gain

What you get out of it.

The Selection brings programs measurable advantages – not just "visibility". Here is what you actually receive.

Independent quality signal

A NZZ-ZHAW-validated Selection Status (Silver to Diamond) for funding applications to federal and cantonal bodies, sponsor acquisition, and stakeholder communication. Independent of self-reporting.

Outcome data your board asks for

Funders increasingly demand outcome data, not just output. Aggregated alumni feedback gives you defensible evidence of programme impact – ready for re-funding rounds, donor reports, and political stakeholders.

A peer-benchmark report

Annual report with your position per dimension and concrete guidance: where you excel against comparable programs, and where there is improvement potential.

Better-qualified applicants

Swiss founders filter by program type, funding range, and sector – and find you with intent. Better application quality, fewer off-topic submissions, less screening overhead.

Who can apply

Four disciplines, one methodology

Awards measure talent identification. Grants measure funding impact. Education measures learning effect. Foundation initiatives measure mission impact. Different functions need different yardsticks.

No cross-type comparison. A Diamond Award is a Diamond Award – not "better" or "worse" than a Diamond Grant. Both are at the top of their discipline.

Grant & Voucher

FUNDING INSTRUMENTS

Application → cash, no hub infrastructure

Venture Kick · BRIDGE · Innogrant · Innovation Cheque

Awards & Competitions

TALENT RECOGNITION

Competition → prize for best performers

de Vigier · ZKB Pionier · Swiss Medtech · Top 100

Education & Training

SKILLS & LEARNING

Curriculum-based, learning-effect measured

Innosuisse Training · Venturelab · Startup Academy

Foundation & Impact

MISSION-DRIVEN

Climate · social · health initiatives

Botnar · KlimUp · ClimAccelerator · Innovation Booster

THE CORE

Your alumni voice
the data your funders want.

Self-reports can be polished. Founder experiences cannot. We anonymously survey your alumni and weight their aggregated voice as the strongest dimension in your score – because that is the data quality that distinguishes evidence from marketing.

SHEET B SURVEY · ANONYMOUS · AGGREGATED

You list at least 8 alumni. We do the rest.

You list alumni from your last three cohorts (or for awards: the last three award years; for education: the last three training years). We send a discipline-specific survey, send reminders, and aggregate the results. You never see individual responses — only the aggregated score per dimension. Until 8 reviews come back, your profile stays in private "Provisional" mode — nothing is published without your consent.


  • 8+ ALUMNI REVIEWS NEEDED
  • 40% SCORE WEIGHT
  • 100% ANONYMOUS & AGGREGATED

SAMPLE FROM THE FOUNDER SURVEY (5 OF 12 ITEMS, CALIBRATED PER DISCIPLINE)

  1. Question
    Scale: significantly worsened → significantly improved  ·  measures investor access impact

 

How it works

Three data sources.
Five dimensions. One ranking per discipline.

Self-assessment, anonymous alumni feedback, and expert validation from the Swiss ecosystem
each data source feeds its own dimensions. Single-layer model, no double weighting.

1 Data Collection — three sources, alumni voice at the core
Sheet B · Weight 40%
Alumni Feedback
Discipline-specific survey · 12 items
Anonymous · aggregated · trimmed mean
Min. 8 alumni reviews required
Sheet A
Self-Assessment
Program team · ~20 min
Track record · substance · funding · scale
Sheet C · Expert
Expert Validation
Swiss investors · coaches · hub leads
Only those who know your program
Min. 5 expert reviews required
↓  Each item: 0–10 pts · calibrated per program discipline  ↓
2 Five Sub-Indices — founder outcomes clearly dominant
Founder Outcomes
40%
Sheet B
Track Record
25%
A5, A6
Programme Substance
20%
A4.1–A4.6
Funding Capacity
8%
A3.1–A3.5
Scale & Reach
7%
A2, A6
Scoring Formula — Total Score 0 to 100
Score = 0.40Founder Outcomes + 0.25Track Record + 0.20Programme Substance + 0.08Funding Capacity + 0.07Scale & Reach
Calibrated per discipline — same weights, different thresholds. Awards are not penalised for missing coaching substance. Education measures learning effect, not follow-on funding. Foundation programs measure mission impact.
Single-layer model: each dimension has its own data source — no double weighting. Comparisons exclusively within the same program discipline. A Diamond Grant is never compared to a Diamond Award.
3 Selection Status — four levels per discipline
Silver 70 – 79.9 Top 30%
Gold 80 – 89.9 Top 15%
Platinum 90 – 94.9 Top 5%
Diamond ≥ 95.0 Top 1%
4 Program Disciplines
Grant & Voucher 15+ Awards & Competitions 8+ Education & Training 10+ Foundation & Impact 12+
= 4 Independent Rankings One per discipline · no cross-type comparison
Badge always carries discipline suffix

Weighting of the five dimensions

Dimension Weight What is measured
Founder Outcomes 40% Sheet B Survey · Min. 8 alumni reviews · anonymous & aggregated
Track Record & Alumni Performance 25% Top startups, follow-on funding rate, market traction
Programme Substance & Quality 20% Coaching, mentoring, BD, investor access (self-assessed)
Funding Capacity & Fairness 8% Funding amount, equity stake, non-cash resources
Scale & Reach 7% Cohorts, throughput, alumni network

Selection Status

Selection Status per discipline

These four tiers apply independently within each program discipline.

Silver

Score 70 – 79

Gold

Score 80 – 89

Platinum

Score 90 – 94

Diamond

Score ≥ 95

How to apply

Four steps. About 25 minutes total.

Submission today, full Selection Status with the public release in October 2026. Sensitive data beyond the published profile is never disclosed.

01

Create your free profile

Register with your work email and select your program discipline. No credit card, no subscription. Your profile stays private until you actively choose to publish it.

02

Complete the self-assessment

Structured questions across the five dimensions. You can save and resume any time. Sensitive fields (budget sources, sponsor agreements) stay private and never appear publicly.

03

List alumni for the survey

Provide email addresses for alumni from your last three cohorts (or award years, or training years). We handle dispatch, automated reminders, and aggregation. Survey runs 4–6 weeks.

04

Receive your score & badge

Your final score and Selection Status arrive with the public release in October 2026. Sensitive data beyond the published profile is never disclosed.

Your Data

You share a lot.
We share nothing.

The assessment requires detailed information about your startup.
Here is exactly what we do — and do not — do with it.

What we do

  • Store all data on Swiss servers (DSG- and GDPR-compliant)
  • Let you control per field what is visible publicly
  • Share anonymised aggregate statistics with ZHAW for research
  • Send you a detailed score breakdown for internal use
  • Delete your entire profile within 48 h upon request

What we never do

  • Sell or license your data to third parties
  • Use your data for advertising or profiling purposes
Ready to apply?

Submit your program profile.

Choose your discipline, complete the self-assessment in 25 minutes,
and list alumni for the anonymous feedback.

Register now
DSG- & GDPR-compliant / 5+ GRANTS / 8+ AWARDS / 10+ EDUCATION / 12+ FOUNDATION pre-registered already